![]() |
Bulletin 80 |
Bulletin
80
Ozone
Treatment of Microbially Contaminated Cooling and Lubricating Oils
The biological instability of oil/water emulsions
used for various cooling and lubricating functions poses an environmental
problem.
Inside plants, these liquids are generally
contained in small vats near each machine or in large common vats serving many
machines. The liquids are subject
to unwanted fermentation by microorganisms that abound in the air.
Most of these are harmless to man, but do degrade the emulsions making it
necessary to replace them from time to time.
This is a costly program. New
lubricant must be purchased and extra payments are required for proper disposal
of the old. Pathogenic bacteria often gain a foothold in the solutions
and are carried to the machine work stations where workers are exposed to
possible infection. Much of the
dermatitis conditions found among machine tool workers is traceable to this
source and has been clarified when the solutions are kept biologically clean.
Other known diseases including salmonella, typhoid, and legionnaires
disease have been isolated from such tanks.
Foul odors are inevitably produced causing
"Monday morning stench" that often causes delays in getting the labor
force started to productive work - waiting for the odors to dissipate after the
circulation has been operating awhile. These
odors are proof of the damaging work of the microorganism.
Action by microorganisms can be partly
controlled by the addition of biocides to the coolubricant.
Such chemicals are costly and often contribute to the irritability of the
solution in contact with skin. The
FDA and EPA have eliminated the use of mercurials and chlorinated phenols that
were early favorites. Today we must
rely upon the weaker formaldehyde releasing agents which are also irritants.
Biocides are consumed in the process causing them to be replaced at more
expense. Many plants discard the contents of the smaller tanks
frequently rather than face the expense of adding biocides. The rationale is that so little coolant is lost that it is
less costly to replace the solution. Larger
tanks are changed less frequently because of the greater cost, but very few of
these last longer than two or three months unless more effective means are taken
to preserve them.
Ozone, ultraviolet energy and hydrogen peroxide
have been effective in combating bacterial growth without the addition of
irritant factors to the material being treated.
At times two or more of these agents may be economically applied to
prolong the usefulness of coolubricants. Ozone
is the most effective of these and is generally the first choice.
The others may be added if necessary.
Ozone is an active, yet unstable, form of
oxygen that is the most powerful oxidizing biocide available.
It is stronger than chlorine or bromine and provides a cascading action
in that it sterilizes at each of several steps during its decomposition.
It is most conveniently applied by bubbling a dilute concentration of the
gas into the holding tank or existing purifying system near the clean discharge
port. Ozone is generated as needed
near the point of treatment and is generated only so long as it is being used.
There is no need to store it. It
is made safely, and no ozone escapes from the system to enter the work space
atmosphere.
Ozone generators are sized to the application.
A tank holding 20,000 gallons or more will have its own generator. A single
generator might, however, supply the ozone for treating several tanks with
individual capacities of between 30
and 1000 gallons. When several
tanks are treated by a common generator, they should be within 50 feet of each
other and must be balanced hydraulically. It
is simpler to treat several tanks in sequence rather than to balance the feeds.
Generators may also be moved from site to site in a plant to service more
tanks because constant ozonation is seldom required to gain the purpose.
The use of ozone will:
1.
Prolong the useful life of coolubricants
2.
Save money on replacement of oils used
3.
Save money through reduced amount of biocide used
4.
Save money on extra charges for waste disposal
5.
Reduce odors in the work space - more pleasant conditions
6.
Reduce bacteria in the cooling bath contacting workers
7.
Reduce incidence of dermatitis among workers
8.
Reduce other microorganisms capable of growing there
USE IN WASTE
STREAMS
The same equipment may be used to destroy many toxic
substances and to reduce the BOF and COD values of various effluents throughout
the plant before emptying them for sewerage.
In such uses, it is more common to allow the entire output of the ozone
generator to flow into a single treating point rather constantly and to not
divide its use.
We have installed ozone treatment for large
coolubricant tanks since 1972. Many
of these hold in excess of 10,000 gallons.
In each case bacterial development has been controlled, dermatitis has
been reduced or eliminated, and life of the system has been materially
lengthened. There are several
documented periods of more than a year between changes of coolubricant.
We have now developed smaller ozone generating
units that may be applied economicaly to smaller tanks with capacities down to
and including 30 gallons. Because
it is seldom necessary to ozonate continuously, these small generators may be
moved from tank to tank, or several tanks may be served from a common generator.
These generators utilize photochemical rather than corona sources.
As a result, they do not require the dehydration of the air stream
feed-stock nor do they require the high voltage.
The basic generator consists of photochemical
ozone generator tube assembly mounted on board with provisions for air filters,
timers, switches, and valves. Means
are provided for attachment to plant air supply and a check valve protects the
output. Equipment as provided may
be plumbed (by plant maintenance) to the application points using either plastic
tubing or pipe. Diffusers are
supplied as needed in each tank to be treated.

HOME / ABOUT US / PRODUCTS / UV AND OZONE / CONTACT US